爲什麼國外沒有一家互聯網公司在中國取得成功，爲什麼他們都水土不服，爲什麼他們都在中國都混不下去，YAHOO, EBAY等等這樣享譽全球的互聯網公司都在中國無法取得成功！爲什麼連讓IT巨無霸微軟都覺得發抖，讓比爾·蓋茨夜夜做惡夢的Google在中國都覺得水土不服！混不下去想撤退！
爲什麼微軟在中國混的有聲有色，比如說，爲什麼能得到政策支持，立法強制每臺出售的電腦必須安裝正版操作系統！等等。在一些政府大單採購上，壓制國產的金山，紅旗等等！爲什麼綠壩這樣的剽竊美國人開源源碼的軟件在中國還混的風聲水起!全國人民爲它買單呢！
爲什麼說在中國，程序員普遍不被尊重，程序員幹到35歲，就必須考慮轉型，不能再幹程序員呢，爲什麼說在中國，善於搞關係，玩權謀，會做人的人都普遍混的要比技術很牛的程序員強，爲什麼在中國，厚黑學，關係學的書籍如此暢銷，而在西方正好相反，程序員受到尊重，尤其技術很牛的程序員，爲什麼中國國產的厚黑學，關係學在西方行不通呢！
同樣爲什麼中國這麼多科研機構，研究所，建國已經60年，都誕生不了諾貝爾獎獲得者，爲什麼往往中國人在西方留學深造就能獲得諾貝爾獎呢！比如說2009年獲得諾貝爾獎的高錕。
歸根結底，是中國智慧與西方智慧的不同造就的！
我來講解下一位大師眼睛裏的中國智慧與西方智慧的不同！
一個民族有一個民族的智慧，當然不同的民族對智慧的理解也有所不同。中國人所代表的中國智慧觀念，與洋人的西方智慧觀念有很大差距。西方人心目中的智慧人物，無非亞里士多德、牛頓、愛迪生、愛因斯坦，霍金，之流，都是理論家、發明家、創造家。中國人心目中的智慧人物是誰？大家會不約而同地說：“諸葛亮”，”司馬懿”。諸葛亮司馬懿,有什麼發明？沒有；有什麼創造？也沒有；提出過什麼理論？還是沒有（孫武還有部《孫子兵法》）。中國人把諸葛亮,司馬懿視爲最高智慧代表人物的理由在哪裏？因爲諸葛亮玩計謀、搞詐術的水平中國古今第一。司馬懿的隱忍權謀大家有口皆碑，但是他空城計被諸葛亮玩了一把，上方谷被諸葛用計差點被燒死，可以認爲稍遜風騷，可認爲，諸葛第一，司馬其次。
中國的智慧標準是計謀權術，西方的智慧標準是發明創造。按照中國的智慧標準，牛頓、愛迪生、愛因斯坦不過幾個書呆子而已。牛頓遇到諸葛亮，肯定被諸葛亮玩得像如來佛手心裏的軟糖一樣，誰敢在諸葛面前談天才。而按西方的智慧標準，諸葛亮不過是一個擅長計謀的政治人物而已，連一個高等數學方程式都解答不了，誰敢在牛頓面前談智慧。美國前國務卿基辛格之類擅長計謀的政治老腕，不會被列入西方天才人物的行列。
中國有過一個數學家叫陳景潤（現在的90後估計知道的不多了），一天到晚鬼迷心竅地搞什麼“1＋1＝2”的數學猜想。當時周圍的人都把陳景潤視爲呆子、怪人，要不是洋人擡舉了陳景潤，他一直會被認爲是智商接近弱智者的癡愚人物。陳景潤的論文登出後，中國的反應如同石沉大海，洋人卻興奮起來：“你們中國有個天才的數學家陳景潤！我們要請他去講學。”洋人給陳景潤的癡愚平反摘帽，但仍有許多中國人不以爲然：“不就是一個怪才嘛”。
西方認爲人類最高的智慧體現在對宇宙自然的理解，智慧的高低是“與自然鬥爭”能力的大小，把天才的美稱授予那些揭示自然法則的理論家、巧妙利用自然力量的發明家。中國則認爲人類最高的智慧體現在對“人”的理解控制，智慧的高低是“與人鬥爭”能力的大小。中國的聰明人標準是：精於爲人處世，老謀深算，隨機應變，討好上級，拉攏平級，利用下級。不會做這些的，均被列入“老實”、“呆子”、“不識時務”不開竅愚昧人之列。中國有句格言：“做人比做事更重要”，陳景潤那樣不懂做人的人在中國找老婆都難，提到科學，有些國人會不服氣：“中國漢代的張衡最早發明了觀測地震的蛤蟆罐，五代的祖沖之最早算出了高精度的圓周率，明代的萬氏最早造出了載人的火箭飛凳……”。但我們也應該瞭解，張衡、祖沖之、萬氏等人，都是歷史學家爲了和洋人爭口氣，硬從歷史垃圾堆中發掘出來的稀有人物。在中國漫長曆史中，極少有人知道這些人的存在，更不要說把他們視爲中華民族智慧的化身了。
古代中國人向來不重視科技發明，我們是四大發明的故鄉，但是那些發明人誰關注過，古代哪個統治者，哪個當官的重視過科技，整天玩黨爭，爭權奪利，個個整天琢磨着自己升官發財，玩計謀，拉關係，結朋黨，都想着怎麼打擊對手，壓榨百姓，討皇帝歡心。當時GDP佔據世界80%的南宋，科技，經濟誰敢說不好，被蒙古給滅了，其實士兵戰鬥力是一個問題，爲什麼蒙古大軍天下無敵，就是因爲重視科技，重視火炮，最後南宋在火炮，弓箭這些武器不重視，那些工匠反過來被蒙古所用，最後自己士兵戰鬥力不如別人，兵器不如別人，不被滅纔怪！談近一點的，鴉片戰爭，直接拿長矛大刀跟別人機槍大炮的幹，喪權辱國，割地賠款。
西方哲人的智慧體現在抽象思維上。與孟子同時代的古希臘學者亞里士多德，首創研究無生命物質世界的構造、運動和原因的《物理學》，並提出自然科學中一系列最基本的概念：“物質”、“空間”、“時間”、“運動”。亞里士多德還首先提出《方法論》問題，總結出“歸納”與“演繹”兩種邏輯推理方法。應該說亞里士多德的最大貢獻之一就是提出“力”的抽象概念，並創立了力與運動關係的“運動定律”（後來伽利略對亞里士多德的“運動定律”發生疑問，提出了“慣性定律”）。在牛頓總結出著名的“力學三定律”後，宏觀力學基本成熟，量子力學爲代表的微觀力學又開闢了新的時代。可以說沒有“力”的抽象概念，就沒有今天的自然科學。
與此相比，中國哲人的智慧體現在感性思維上。中國哲人雖不擅長提出抽象概念和創立法則定律，但卻善於講故事，把深刻的人生哲理用淺顯的文學方式表達出來，中國古代哲學都寓於名人的教誨和故事般的寓言中。比如“守株待兔”、“刻舟求劍”、“鄭人買履”這三個寓言，作者想要表達的意思其實都一樣，但中國哲人卻無法把這些具體的寓言抽象昇華爲一個理性概念，洋哲學家則把中國哲人想要說而說不出來的內涵抽象概括爲一個概念：“教條主義”。再比如“掩耳盜鈴”、“疑人盜斧”、“罰人吃肉”三個寓言的意思也一樣，中國哲人無法像西方哲人那樣將這些寓言抽象爲一個概念：“主觀主義”。
中國的寓言類似於西方的童話，但童話是給兒童看的，因爲兒童的理性思維能力比較差。而中國的寓言卻是給成人看的，按照西方的標準，中國的寓言就是“成人的童話”。中國的國民性是什麼？魯迅無法用理性思維得出一個抽象的概念，只好借用感性思維的寓言方式，寫了《阿Q正傳》。當然魯迅用感性思維的方法是用對了，因爲中國人對理性抽象的東西有一種天然的抗拒感，理性強的學說很難在中國得到廣泛的接受。
另一方面，中國和西方測試個人智慧的方式也有所不同。西人用IQ試題檢測你的發想力、推理力和創造力，然後給你一個大腦IQ值。西方大學的入學考試，都是以測試學生的推理想象能力爲主。古代中國怎樣評價個人的智慧呢？這就是科舉考試，用寫文章來評價你的智慧程度，秀才、舉人、進士的差別就在於寫文章水平的高低，文章寫得最好的被皇帝賜封狀元。一個家族如果出一個狀元，那是極其榮耀的事，會永久記載在家譜中成爲後人的驕傲。
中國科舉考試考什麼呢？既不是考應試者的邏輯推理和想象創新能力，也不是考應試者掌握知識的數量和準確程度，而是考應試者的“文采”。由於文采沒有一個客觀的標準，所以中國的科舉考試不象西方大學考試有一個客觀的分數，考生在科舉考試中排名完全由主考官個人的好惡來決定。
中國所謂的“文采”又是什麼呢？這也沒有一個客觀的定義，很難用語言來精確說明。大致講來，有“文采”的文章，作者不是簡單直接地表達自己的思想，而是用比喻、借喻、誇張、擬人等文學手法來間接婉轉地表達思想，平鋪直敘講大白話被認爲文字水平較低。古代中國把文學表現手法稱爲“賦”、“比”、“興”，朱熹說：“賦者，敷陳其事而直言之者也；比者，以彼物比此物也；興者，先言他物以引起所詠之詞也”。西方沒有“文采”這個概念，只好把“文采”翻成“literary talent”，西方人也很難理解中國文人追求的“文采”到底是什麼東西。
西方畫的特點是寫實、寫生，繪畫以忠實模寫自然爲第一要義。而中國畫的特點是寫意，畫家用比喻誇張的手法表達自己的生活感受。同樣西方文章的特點是文字表達的準確性和客觀性，東洋文章的特點則是文字表達的比喻和誇張，動不動就來個“白髮三千丈”。洋人小說中描寫美女，直接描寫她眼睛怎樣、臉龐怎樣、身段怎樣、表情怎樣，而中國古代小說描寫美女卻喜歡用比喻的手法：“沉魚落雁，羞花閉月”。中國人認爲爲了達到“文采”效果，犧牲描述事實的準確性也是可以的，所以纔有張繼的問題詩《楓橋夜泊》:
“月落烏啼霜滿天，江楓漁火對愁眠。姑蘇城外寒山寺，夜半鐘聲到客船。”
月落本應該是黎明時分，後面又說“夜半”，夜半與月落的時間相關顯然不對；烏鴉是白晝動物，和雞一樣晚上睡覺，半夜聽到烏鴉叫，就像半夜雞叫一樣不自然；再者寺院也鮮有半夜敲鐘的，“夜半鐘聲”也讓人感到詫異。由於中國詩詞並不著重“寫實”，而著重“寫意”，只要意境好，即使詩境與現實不符，也仍被認爲是好詩。
中國古代創造過多種文學題材，詩經楚辭漢賦唐詩宋詞，都非常強調講究文采。新文化運動前，白話文小說是不登大雅之堂的俗人玩藝兒，有水平教養的文人都是吟詩作賦。《三國》、《水滸》等小說本來寫的不錯，可是作者每每到關鍵時刻，總忘不了賦詩一首，來個“有詩爲證”，硬塞入一首不倫不類的詩，試圖以此來表現作者的“文采”。作者似乎是想說：“我不是隻會寫白話文，我也會寫詩”。
中國爲什麼沒有創造出“科學”？其關鍵之一就是中國沒有創造出直接準確描述事物的“論文”體裁。西方人把文字當作交流思想的工具，而中國人把文字當作賣弄學問的敲門磚，動不動就要來一點“賦比興”的文學手法。如果請一位中國狀元起死回生來描寫一個化學實驗，很可能會是這樣：“當酒精燈燒得像早春二月陽光一樣溫暖的時候，放上一隻少女眼眸般光碧晶瑩的燒杯，加入宛如觀音菩薩玉瓶裏露珠的清澈潔淨蒸餾水，即刻發生令人讚歎不已的奇妙化學反應，快似疾風，速比閃電……”。
中國文人極其重視文字的華麗和表現的優雅，卻非常忽視文字表達的準確性和客觀性，經常不分場合濫用文采修辭，因此中國無法誕生西方式科學論文體裁。有人以爲洋人讀枯燥無味的科學論文是因爲這些文章有實用價值，可是我們應該記得，亞里士多德、伽利略、牛頓的時代，自然科學並不象現在，是毫無實用價值的“純學術”。中國人大概很難理解洋人爲什麼會對那種枯燥描述自然現象的毫無文采的科學論文發生興趣。
有人以爲中國在搞了科舉考試以後，纔出現重視文采不重視思想內容的傾向。其實中國重文采是自古就有的傳統，漢代尚沒有科舉考試，但漢代的特產“漢賦”，卻是中國歷史上最重文采輕內容的文體。司馬相如寫了一篇《上林賦》，其受歡迎程度居然搞到洛陽紙貴，但《上林賦》除了通篇的美麗辭藻外，卻沒有什麼實在的內容。
由於中國人的智慧觀，把寫作文采當作智慧的標準，造成長年來中國文人華而不實的文風。古人也感到這種重文不重實的行文弊病，唐代韓愈、柳宗元等人發起過一個古文運動，提倡學習先秦古人樸實的文風，認爲文章應以內容爲重，“言必近真、不尚雕彩”。中國古代早有白話文，幾百年前的《三國》《水滸》就是用白話文寫的，但白話文一直在中國文人界吃不開。白話文可清楚準確地表達思想感情，文言文就很難做到這一點，所以無法用文言文書寫細膩情感的小說。中國文人放著準確表達思想的簡單白話文不用，偏喜歡用連斷句都要費幾分腦筋的複雜文言文，還喜歡在裏面加一些不作解釋的典故，更讓人難於理解。
如果說白話文長於“表達思想”，文言文則長於“賣弄學問”。“表達思想”越簡單清晰越好，而“賣弄學問”卻是越曲折繞彎越顯得有學問。明明可以用簡單直接的話講清楚的事，中國文人卻要借古懷思，引經據典，搞得十分複雜。你用簡單的詞句，會被認爲是學識不夠，文采不深。用地攤小販都會講的白話文寫文章，沒有賦比興的烘托，沒有起承轉合的文脈，不引經據典，如何展現作者淵博的學識與華麗的文采？
五四後模仿西方的新文學運動在中國興起，下里巴人的白話文才在中國登上文壇。胡適等人提倡學習西方的寫實文風，少用修辭，不用典故。據豐子愷回憶，他在浙江第一師範讀書時，正值學校提倡新文學，反對封建文學，要求學生作文時“不準講空話，要老實寫”。一個學生寫自己奔喪時用了“星夜匍伏奔喪”，被老師責問：“你那天晚上真的是在地上爬去的嗎？”
儘管廢除科舉引進西學以後，中國人的智慧觀有所改變，但中國仍然是詩的國家，人們喜歡比喻和誇張，喜歡中國畫那樣詩般的意境，對西方追求真實的科學和追求寫實的藝術，總是敬而遠之。中國極少會有人不是爲了應付考試，不是爲了寫畢業論文，而單純出於興趣去讀亞里士多德《物理學》那樣缺乏文采的論理文章（陳景潤則是例外中的例外）。
中國的智慧也有其閃光之處，在研究人性的缺點並加以利用方面，遠遠走在西方前面。西方無數的軍事學家、將帥參謀，打了幾千年仗，卻從來沒有想出過“空城計”這樣的絕計。如果用同樣的兵器，古羅馬軍團無法戰勝善於用計的中國將軍。比如說在二戰太平洋戰場上，美軍打得過鬼子，朝鮮戰場，中國軍隊爲什麼能和美軍達成平手，也正是因爲朝鮮戰爭，中國才得以躋身大國行列。治理中國自然也要用中國式的智慧，西方式的智慧在中國行不通。
西方人把思想家當作民族智慧的驕傲，中國人則把計謀家當作民族智慧的結晶。西方人看來陳景潤比司馬懿更智慧，因爲陳景潤和愛因斯坦是同一類人；而中國人看來基辛格比愛因斯坦更聰明，因爲基辛格和司馬懿是同一類人，中國智慧和西方智慧是沒有交點的兩條平行線。西方智慧重視“與自然鬥”，所以誕生了一個又一個思想家發明家；中國智慧重視“與人鬥”，所以出現了一個又一個陰謀家，厚黑天才。一個計謀家生在西方是一個悲劇，一個發明家生在中國也是一個悲劇。司馬懿如果生在美國，一輩子只能在做個精於權謀的小地主，找不到施展抱負的機會；愛迪生如果在中國，一輩子也只能在藥鋪裏當一位普通的售貨郎，同樣找不到發明創造的機會。
按照西方的智慧標準，中華民族是一個缺少思想，守舊自封，不重視發明創造，就會玩小聰明聰明反被聰明誤的民族；而按照中國的智慧標準，中華民族則是一個深曉世故人情、隨機融通、機靈活絡的絕頂智慧民族。
在中國，技術再牛，也是一個就會技術的呆子，怪才。在西方，搞關係，厚黑學是沒有市場的，所以大家看出今日之中國與西方差距之大！
在中國IT業，想混的好，光技術牛是不夠，重點是做人，某些時候做人比做事還要重要！還有程序員乾的不能超過35歲，不然以後沒得混了，所以多想想做人你的轉型會很順利！否則得話要艱難地多！
無奈生在中國，技術牛人們要學會入鄉隨俗！儘管都說小公司做事，大公司做人，但是做人是必須學會的，不然的話，空有強悍的技術，整天被別人算計！做爲程序員一定要學會適應社會，物競天擇，適者生存。
2009年，華裔科學家高錕獲得諾貝爾獎，中國人和猶太人的智商高聞名世界，爲什麼中國人這麼聰明，爲什麼至今本土沒有一個人能獲得諾貝爾獎呢，中國建國已經60多年，無數的科研機構，以色列那麼小，一個茸茸小國，建國比中國還晚，接二連三地有人獲得諾貝爾獎！中國從來不缺人才，但是那些人才往往沒有機會與空間成長，往往是會做人會做事的人壓制住了會做更大的事不會做人的人。
聯想到google就要撤退中國，國外互聯網公司在中國爲何沒有一家能夠成功，最大的缺點就是太不瞭解中國人了！太不瞭解中國智慧了！想在中國混得開，必須理解並學會中國智慧！同時Google的西方思維就是標榜自己就是一個搜索引擎，與搜索結果無關。但是西方思維在中國沒有市場！
我建議Google總裁一定要認真閱讀一下《明朝那些事兒》，我相信他一定會從這本書裏找到Google怎樣才能在中國混的風生水起的辦法！建議他認真瞭解中國最偉大的聖人之一的學問，王陽明的心學，知行合一。什麼是知行合一？答：就是知與行的合一。無論有多麼偉大正直的理想，要實現它，還必須懂得兩個字——變通。只有變通，只有切合實際的行動，才能適應這個氣象萬千的中國。如果他的西方思維不能接受這個中國思維的話，我可以去Google全球總部親自去給他講解下古老的中國思維與中國智慧。
同時建議下Google總裁，同時Google中國的人才標準不能完全西方化， Google中國應該成立一個公關部，挑選一下中國智慧標準的人才（當然這種人才放在Google中國研發部的話會讓Google的技術變弱的），相信未來Google一定會在中國大放光彩！
爲了避免google副總不能理解漢字的真義，特翻譯英文供google老大查看！
Why does not a foreign company in China, the success of the Internet, why they are acclimatized, why they are in China are Hunbuxiaqu, YAHOO, EBAY, and so such a world-renowned Internet companies in China can not be successful! Why do they let IT giant Microsoft felt shaking, so that Bill Gates nightmares every night of Google in China, feel acclimatized! Hunbuxiaqu would like to retreat!
Why is Microsoft in China, a very impressive mix, for example, why get policy support, legislation forced the computer must be installed on each sale of genuine operating systems! And so on. In some big purchases on the government to suppress made in China Jinshan, red and so on! Why is plagiarism so the Americans the green dam open source software in China is also mixed with water from the wind! Of the National People do pay for it!
Why do we say in China, the programmers are not respected, programmers stem to 35-year-old, you must consider the transformation of the programmer can not do it, why is that in China, good at engaging in relationships, playing all kinds of tricks would be a man of the people are generally mixed The technology is cattle programmer than strong, and why in China, the thick black school, relationships, school books so popular, while in the West, on the contrary, programmers are respected, in particular, technology is cattle programmers, why Chinese-made thick black science, the relationship between science in the West do not work!
Similarly, why so many Chinese scientific research institutions, research institutes, has been 60 years since the founding of the PRC, are not the birth of Nobel Prize winners, why are the Chinese post-graduate study in the West it will be able to get the Nobel Prize! For example, in 2009 won the Nobel Prize Kao.
In the final analysis, is wisdom and the wisdom of the West created by the different!
Me, eyes off his a master of Chinese wisdom and the wisdom of the West different!
A nation with a nation's wisdom, of course, different peoples of the wisdom of understanding are different. Chinese people on behalf of the Chinese intellectual ideas, and the foreigners have a big gap between the Western concept of intelligence. Westerners in mind the wisdom of people, none other than Aristotle, Newton, Edison, Einstein, Hawking, and his ilk, are theorists, inventors, and create at home. The eyes of the Chinese people's wisdom figure who? You will invariably say: "wise," "Sima Yi." Zhuge Liang Sima Yi, what invention? No; What is creation? No; proposed theory? Or not (Sun Wu also Ministry "The Art of War"). Chinese people have Zhuge Liang, Sima Yi as the highest representative of the wisdom of the reasons for where? Because the trick play Zhuge Liang, engage in the level of Chinese ancient and modern first treachery. Sima Yi's forbear trickery we proverbial, but he was empty city was wise to play the one, the top of the Valley of dollars came close to being burned to death by Zhuge can be considered lagged, one could argue that Zhuge first, and Antonio followed.
China's intellectual standard trick trickery, the Western intellectual standard inventions. In accordance with the wisdom of the Chinese standard, Newton, Edison, Einstein, but only a few nerds. Newton met Zhuge Liang, Zhuge Liang certainly be played with heart in hand, like candy, like Buddha who dares to talk about before Zhuge genius. While the wisdom of Western standards, Zhuge Liang is a good trick, but a political figure only, and even an advanced mathematical formula can not have answers to who dares to talk about the wisdom of Newton's face. Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, like good old political trick wrist and will not be included in the ranks of the Western genius.
China has been a mathematician named Chen's (now 90 after the estimate is not much to know), all day long possessed engage in so-called "1 +1 = 2" mathematical conjecture. Chen's people around at that time regarded as a fool, cranks, but for foreigners favors Chen's, he has would be considered mentally retarded IQ foolishly close to people. Chen's paper sign out, China's response as no response, foreigners are excited: "You have a Chinese mathematician Chen's genius! We would like to invite him to lecture." Foreigners to Chen's rehabilitation Zhaimao foolishly, but there are still many China did not approve of: "Is not a geeks Well."
The highest in the West that human wisdom is reflected in the understanding of the universe, nature, wisdom, the level of a "struggle with nature," the size of the ability to grant those who reveal the genius of the reputation of natural law theorist, inventor of ingenious use of the forces of nature. China believes that the highest human wisdom embodied in the "people" understand the control of the level of intelligence is "the struggle with others" capacity size. China's wise men is this: skilled and acted, wily and resourceful, to please their superiors, to draw level class, the use of lower level. Do not do this, and were included in the "honest", "idiot", "given to" non-resuscitation ignorant person. Chinese proverb: "a man is more important than work," Chen's like people who do not know a man is immune wives in China, referring to science, some people may not seem convinced: "The Chinese Han Zhang Heng invented the earliest observations of earthquakes toad tank five generations of ancestors of the earliest to arrive at the red circle the rate of high-precision, Ming Wan's first manned rocket flight produce weapons of a stool ... .... " But we also should understand that Zhang Heng, Zu Chong Zhi, Wan's, and others are historians and foreigners in order to Zhengkou Qi, hard to uncover them from the dustbin of history a rare figure. In China's long history, very few people are aware that the existence of these people, not to mention them as the embodiment of the wisdom of the Chinese.
Ancient Chinese people always attach importance to technological innovation does not, we are the home of four great inventions, but those who concerned about the inventor before, which the ancient rulers, which serves as an official of the serious attention of science and technology, all day long to play the party struggles, power struggles, each day pondering with their own career and make a fortune, playing tricks, Latin American relations, forming cliques, are thinking about how to beat their competitors, crushing the people, discuss the emperor favor. Account for 80% of world GDP at that time of the Southern Song, technological, economic Who can say that bad, was Mongolia to eliminate, but in fact soldiers in combat is a problem, why the Mongol armies invincible, that is, with their emphasis on science and technology, emphasis on artillery, finally sound like artillery, bow and arrow these weapons do not pay attention to those artisans in turn be used in Mongolia, and finally his own soldiers than fighting someone else, and weapons than others, do not be strange if Pimie! On nearly 1 o'clock, and the Opium War, direct holding spears, machetes with others artillery gun dry, humiliating, cede territory and pay indemnities.
Western philosopher's wisdom is reflected in an abstract way of thinking. And Mencius, the ancient Greek scholar Aristotle contemporary, pioneering study of non-living material world, the structure, movement and causes of "Physics" and also proposed a series of basic natural science concepts: "material", "Space "and" time "," movement. " Aristotle was also the first that "methodological" problem, concludes that "induction" and "deduction" two kinds of logical reasoning. Should be said that one of Aristotle's greatest contribution to that "power" of the abstraction and the creation of the relationship between force and movement of the "laws of motion" (and later Galileo on Aristotle's "laws of motion" occurred doubt, put forward the "inertia"). Newton summed up the famous "three laws of mechanics", the macro-mechanics basically mature, quantum mechanics, represented by the micro-mechanics has opened up a new era. It can be said there is no "force" of the abstraction, there is no natural science of today.
In contrast, the Chinese sage's wisdom embodied in the emotional way of thinking. Chinese philosopher, though not good at abstract concepts and the creation of rules proposed by the law, but they are good at storytelling, the profound philosophy of life literature to use simple mode of expression, the ancient Chinese philosophy, all reside in the teachings and stories of celebrities like the fable. Such as "sit back and wait", "disregard the changing circumstances", "people are buying Lu Zheng," This three fables, the authors want to express the meaning in fact the same, but the Chinese philosopher can not put these specific fable abstract concept of sublimation as a rational, Western philosophers put the Chinese philosopher want to say but can not tell the content to be summed up as an abstract concept: "dogmatism." Then such as "self-deceiving," "suspect, Pirates of the ax," "fine people to eat meat," meaning the same three fables, Chinese philosophers did not like the Western philosophers of these fables abstract as a concept: "subjectivism."
China's Fables similar to Western fairy tales, but fairy tales are for children to see, because the children's rational thinking abilities are relatively poor. While China's Fables is looking for adults, according to Western standards, China's fable is the "adult fairy tale." What is China's national character? Lu Xun rational thought can not come to an abstract concept, had to borrow sensual fable way of thinking and writing of "The Story of Ah Q." Of course, Lu Xun's thinking with the emotional way is right, because Chinese people are rational and abstract things have a natural sense of resistance, rational theory of strong in China, it is difficult to gain widespread acceptance.
On the other hand, China and the West test the wisdom of the way individuals are different. Westerners with the IQ test examination questions want to force your hair, reasoning ability and creativity, and then give you a brain, IQ value. The University of the West entrance examinations are to test the skills of reasoning imagination capability. Ancient Chinese how to assess individual's intelligence? This is the imperial examinations, with writing articles to assess the extent of your wisdom, scholar, Exams, chin-shih of the difference lies in the level of high and low write articles, articles written by the emperor encomiendas the best champion. If a family of a champion, it is extremely honorable thing would be permanently recorded in the pedigree to become the pride of later generations.
Chinese imperial examinations were what? Is neither a test candidate to imagine the logic of reasoning and ability to innovate, nor is it equipped with the knowledge exam candidate number and degree of accuracy, but the test candidate's "literary grace." As the literary talent is not an objective standard, so the Chinese imperial examinations will not be like the University of the West there is an objective test scores, candidates in the examinations ranked entirely by examiners to determine the individual's likes and dislikes.
China's so-called "literary talent" then what is it? This is not an objective definition, it is difficult to accurately explain in words. Roughly speaking, the have "literary talent," the article, the author is not a simple and direct way to express his own ideas, but by analogy, metaphor, hyperbole, personification and other literary techniques to express ideas indirectly, euphemistically, telling a tale talk about the level of major vernacular language was considered more low. The performance of the ancient Chinese practice of literature known as "Fu" and "bi", "Xing", Zhu said: "Fu who deposited Chen being to the respect of those who are; than those who, in order to take things than this Peter materials; Xing who first words of praise and otherness in order to rise to the word of it. " The West there is no "literary talent" concept, had to "pay close attention to" translated "literary talent", Westerners have difficulty in understanding Chinese literati's pursuit of "literary talent" in the end what it was.
Western painting is characterized by realism, painting, painting in order to faithfully model was a natural for the first prerequisite. The Chinese painting is characterized by impressionistic painters exaggerated way to use a metaphor to express their feelings of life. Similarly, the West is characterized by the article written to express the accuracy and objectivity of the article Japan is the written word to express the characteristics of metaphor and hyperbole whenever they come to a "white-haired three-Qian Zhang." Beauty depicted in the novel foreigners, directly describing how her eyes, face what movements what expression to do, and beauty of ancient Chinese novels describe the way they like to use the metaphor: "Chenyulayan, shame to spend close on." Chinese people believe that in order to achieve "pay close attention to" effect, sacrifice the accuracy of the facts described is also possible, so have the problem Zhang poem "Midnight Bells":
"Moonset Wu Ti frost sky, Jiangfeng fishing boat on the melancholy sleep. Gusu outside of Cold Mountain Temple, Chimes at Midnight to the passenger."
This should be a moonset at dawn, followed by saying that "the middle of the night," middle of the night and on the ups and downs, time-dependent is clearly wrong; Crow is a daytime animal, and chickens like to sleep at night, at midnight to hear a crow call, just as unnatural as Banyejijiao ; Moreover, the monastery has little to midnight bell, "Chimes at Midnight" also makes surprise to us. As the Chinese poetry does not focus on "realism", while the stress on "impressionistic," as long as the mood is good, even poetic at variance with reality, it is still considered good poetry.
Created a variety of ancient Chinese literature and subject matter, the Book of Songs of Chu Han Fu poetry, are very emphasized that stress literary grace. New Culture Movement ago, the vernacular novel is unrefined laity Wanyi Er, there is the level of educated scholars are Yinshizuofu. "Three Kingdoms", "Water Margin" and other novels have been written well, but the authors often a crucial moment, with a total not forget to write a poem to a "a poem as evidence," a nondescript, hard-squeezed poetry, an attempt to to express the writer's "literary grace." Author seems to want to say: "I am not only to write the vernacular, I would write poetry."
Why China did not create a "science"? One of its key Chinese did not invent the things that directly and accurately describes the "paper" genre. Westerners writing as a tool for exchange of ideas, and the Chinese people have written as a stepping stone pedantic and always must come to a little "more than Fu Xing" literary techniques. If you requested a Chinese scholar to describe a chemical experiment back to life, it might be something like this: "When the lights burn, like alcohol, like the warm sunshine of early spring in February when the girl put a light Bi Yan Mou-like crystal of the beaker, add Guanyin Yu Ping Village dew like the clear clean distilled water and place immediately impressed by the wonderful chemical reactions, fast like high winds, lightning speed ratio ... .... "
China attaches great importance to the text civilian gorgeous and elegant performance, but it is ignored words to express the accuracy and objectivity, often regardless of settings, abuse of literary styles rhetoric, so China can not be the birth of a Western-style scientific paper genre. Some people think that foreigners read boring scientific papers because of these articles of practical value, but we should remember that Aristotle, Galileo, Newton's era, science was not as now, there is no practical value of the "pure academic. " China, it is hard to understand why foreigners would be kind of boring description of natural phenomena have no interest in literary styles of scientific papers.
Some people think that China is engaged in the examination only after there great importance to pay close attention to the contents do not pay attention to ideological tendencies. In fact, China is re-pay close attention to the tradition since ancient times, yet there is no Han imperial examinations, but the specialty of the Han Dynasty, "Han Fu", but it is the history of China's most heavily literary grace light in content style. Sima Xiang-ru wrote an article entitled "Shanglin Fu" and its popularity actually got to Luoyangzhigui, but "Shanglin Fu" In addition to the beautiful rhetoric throughout the outside, but there is no real content.
As the concept of the Chinese people's wisdom, the wisdom of writing literary talent as a standard, resulting in long slick style to the Chinese literati. The ancients also felt that this re-wording of the text is not Shigemi shortcomings in the Tang Dynasty Han Yu, Liu Zong-yuan, who had launched a literary movement, promote the learning of ancient pre-Qin simple style of writing that the article should be content-heavy, "true to its word almost true, not yet eagle color. " Ancient China has long been the vernacular, a few hundred years ago, "Three Kingdoms" "Water Margin" is written with the vernacular, but the vernacular literary circles has been unpopular in China. Vernacular can be clearly and accurately express thoughts and feelings, classical Chinese is difficult to do this, it is not possible with the classical Chinese novel written in delicate emotions. Chinese literati stood a simple and accurate expression of ideas without the vernacular, migraine like to use even punctuate the complexity of their brains have to charge a fraction of classical Chinese writings, but also like to add some inside the story does not explain, even more difficult to understand.
If we say that the vernacular longer than the "expression of thought", classical Chinese is longer than the "pedantic." "Expression of thought" the more simple and clear as possible, and "pedantry" is the more twists and turns Raowan, the more learned. Obviously can be simple and direct words of a clear matter, but would like to take the ancient Chinese literati pregnant thinking, quote the classics, and made very complicated. You use simple words and phrases would be considered to be knowledgeable enough literary talent is not deep. With the stall hawkers are talking about vernacular writing articles, there is no more than Fu-hsing contrast, there is no way transforms the contextual, not citing the classical authors show how the vast knowledge and gorgeous literary talent?
After the imitation of the West 54's new literary movement in China, the rise of the vernacular until the next Reba people boarded the Chinese literary scene. Hu Shi and others to promote the study of Western realist style, use less rhetoric, no allusions. According to Feng recalled that he first Normal school in Zhejiang province at a time when schools to promote a new literature, against the feudal literature and writing, when students are asked, "are not allowed to talk about empty talk and be honest to write." When a student write their own funerals with the "Starry Night creeping V funerals," the teacher questioned: "You are really on the ground that night Paqu it?"
Although the repeal of civil service examination after the introduction of Western learning, the Chinese concept of the wisdom of change, but China is still a poetic country, people like the metaphor and hyperbole, like the artistic conception of Chinese painting, as poetically, to the West the pursuit of real science and the pursuit of realism in art, always distanced themselves from him. China rarely was not to meet the test, not to write theses, and purely out of interest to read Aristotle's "Physics" as a lack of literary talent of the reasoning article (Chen's is the exception in the exception).
China's intelligence also has its shining office, in studying the shortcomings of human nature and make use of far to go in front in the West. Western countless Junshixuejia, generals, staff officers, to fight battles for thousands of years, but has never come up before "empty city" so must count. If you use the same weapons, the Roman army could not defeat good at thousands of Chinese generals. For example, the Pacific Ocean on the battlefield in World War II, the U.S. military fought off devils, North Korea, where Chinese forces and the U.S. military is able to do to reach deuce, but also precisely because of the Korean War, China was able to rank among the great powers. Governance in China, there is naturally with the Chinese-style wisdom, the wisdom of Western-style does not work in China.
Western thinkers as the pride of national wisdom, the Chinese put the trick at home as a national wisdom. Westerners appear to Sima Yi Chen's more than wisdom, because of Chen's and Einstein are the same categories of people; while the Chinese appear to Henry Kissinger smarter than Einstein, as Henry Kissinger and Sima Yi are the same categories of people, China wisdom is not wisdom, and the West point of intersection of two parallel lines. Western intelligence emphasis on "struggle with nature," so was born one after another thinker, inventor; Chinese wisdom emphasis on "fighting with people," so there is a another conspirator, thick black genius. A scheme was born in the West is a family tragedy, an inventor, was born in China is also a tragedy. Sima Yi, if born in the United States, life can only be a skilled in trickery of the small landowners, can not find the ambitions of the opportunities; Edison, if in China, where life can only be in the pharmacy when a general sales Lang, the same finding less than the invention of the opportunities created.
In accordance with the wisdom of Western standards, the Chinese nation is a lack of thinking, old-fashioned self-styled, non-attention to invention, it will play a small clever clever clever misuse of the national anti-being; and the wisdom of the standard in accordance with China, the Chinese nation is a deeply human and therefore Xiao Shi, Random factoring, clever rolling in excellent shape and the wisdom of people.
In China, technology, and then cattle, is also a fool would be technology, geeks. In the West, engaging in relationships, thick black school there is no market, so we see that the gap between China and the West today is great!
In China's IT industry, would like a good mix, optical technology is not enough cattle, focusing on a man, sometimes a man is more important than work! There are programmers doing no more than 35 years old, or there will not get mixed, so think more of a man you will have a smooth transition! Otherwise it would be so hard to be more!
Frustration born in China, technical cow people to learn to do as the Romans! While saying that small companies do things a man of large companies, but being a man is to be learned, otherwise, had plenty of powerful technology, have always been someone calculations! As the programmer must learn to adapt to social, natural selection, survival of the fittest.
In 2009, Chinese scientists won the Nobel Prize Kao, Chinese and Jews world-famous high IQ, why is the Chinese people so smart, why has no one in the local community does have access to the Nobel Prize, the Chinese state has been more than 60 years, numerous research Authority, Israel is so small, a downy small country, nation-building was also later than China, one after another it was the Nobel Prize! China has never been no shortage of talent, but those talents are often not have the opportunity and space to grow will often be a man who faced down things will do even greater things in life people do not.
Think google should retreat in China, foreign Internet companies in China, why not a success, the biggest drawback is that too did not understand the Chinese people! Do not understand Chinese wisdom! Would like to open in China, Hunde, we must understand and learn Chinese wisdom! At the same time Google is to present themselves as the Western mind is a search engine, has nothing to do with the search results. But Western thought in China, there is no market!
I suggest that Google CEO must carefully read the "The Ming dynasty that Matters", I am sure he will find this book how to Google in China's wind and water mixed approach! Suggested that he should seriously look into one of China's greatest sage of the knowledge, Wang Yangming's heart study, apply what they learn. What is apply what they learn? Answer: that is knowing and unity. No matter how great integrity and vision, to realize it, but also must understand the word - work. Only alternative, only the practical actions in order to adapt to this nature in China. If he can not accept the Western mind this Chinese thinking, I can go to Google's global headquarters in person to explain to him under the ancient Chinese thought and Chinese Wisdom.
Also proposed that the next president of Google, while Google China's talent standards can not be completely Westernized, Google China should set up a public relations department, the selection criteria about the wisdom of Chinese people (Of course, such talent on the Google China R & D department, then let Google's technical change weak), I believe the future of Google in China will shine!
發表於 @ 2010年02月19日 21:30:00 | 評論( 216 ) | 編輯| 舉報| 收藏
本文來自CSDN博客，轉載請標明出處：http://blog.csdn.net/yincheng01/archive/2010/02/19/5312011.aspx
